龙芯3A5000LL与i7-10700的UnixBench跑分对比
龙芯
架构: loongarch64
字节序: Little Endian
CPU: 4
在线 CPU 列表: 0-3
每个核的线程数: 1
每个座的核数: 4
座: 1
NUMA 节点: 1
CPU 系列: Loongson-64bit
型号名称: Loongson-3A5000LL
BogoMIPS: 4600.00
L1d 缓存: 64K
L1i 缓存: 64K
L2 缓存: 256K
L3 缓存: 16384K
英特尔
架构: x86_64
处理器操作模式: 32-bit, 64-bit
字节序: Little Endian
地址大小: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU: 16
在线 CPU 列表: 0-15
每个核的线程数: 2
每个座的核数: 8
座: 1
NUMA 节点: 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
型号: 165
型号名称: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz
CPU MHz: 2900.000
CPU max MHz: 4800.0000
CPU min MHz: 800.0000
BogoMIPS: 5799.77
虚拟化: VT-x
L1d 缓存: 32K
L1i 缓存: 32K
L2 缓存: 256K
L3 缓存: 16384K
龙芯跑分:
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 29466399.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3950.2 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4801.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 574277.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 154530.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1661865.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1112434.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 288865.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11881.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8327.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2704.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1217616.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29466399.7 2525.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3950.2 718.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4801.2 1116.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 574277.5 1450.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 154530.5 933.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1661865.0 2865.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1112434.3 894.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 288865.4 722.2
Process Creation 126.0 11881.8 943.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8327.0 1963.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2704.2 4507.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1217616.5 811.7========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1342.8------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 117353855.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15802.3 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 17546.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 770178.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 200917.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2579517.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4430140.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1119742.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 42837.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20755.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2977.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4115032.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 117353855.4 10056.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15802.3 2873.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 17546.7 4080.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 770178.5 1944.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 200917.9 1214.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2579517.0 4447.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4430140.5 3561.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1119742.5 2799.4
Process Creation 126.0 42837.8 3399.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20755.5 4895.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2977.2 4962.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4115032.3 2743.4========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3445.2
i7-10700跑分:
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 59349705.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9540.0 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7200.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1613123.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 425426.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4720434.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2990172.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 308606.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15796.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18735.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 8475.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3500159.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59349705.1 5085.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9540.0 1734.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 7200.7 1674.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1613123.6 4073.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 425426.4 2570.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4720434.2 8138.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2990172.7 2403.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 308606.1 771.5
Process Creation 126.0 15796.8 1253.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18735.9 4418.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 8475.1 14125.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3500159.7 2333.4========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2945.4------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 519769901.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 111240.3 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 47864.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1538356.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 397724.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4889086.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 21435187.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 3008238.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 102306.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 99855.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 12952.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 10496632.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 519769901.7 44539.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 111240.3 20225.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 47864.5 11131.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1538356.3 3884.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 397724.3 2403.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4889086.9 8429.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 21435187.2 17230.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 3008238.6 7520.6
Process Creation 126.0 102306.7 8119.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 99855.0 23550.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 12952.2 21587.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 10496632.4 6997.8========
System Benchmarks Index Score 10944.6
结果:
从跑分结果来看,目前龙芯的单核性能还不到10代i7的一半,多核性能就更羸弱了,在使用过程中也有相当程度的卡顿,龙芯还需要加油啊。
跑分结果仅供参考,如果以后遇到其他版本的龙芯接着测试。
龙芯3A5000LL与i7-10700的UnixBench跑分对比相关推荐
- 2700分+!统信UOS+龙芯3A4000最新Unixbench跑分出炉
近日,第三方测试机构对搭载统信UOS和龙芯3A4000的电脑进行Unixbench测试,测试基于龙芯3A4000处理器(4核心,主频1.8GHz).编译器GCC 7.3.1和统信桌面操作系统UOS(内 ...
- 龙芯教育派UnixBench跑分
1 系统概况 2 Unixbench跑分 # 下载阿里云版本unixbench wget https://github.com/aliyun/byte-unixbench/releases/downl ...
- 联发科mtk和骁龙730哪个好_联发科g90t和骁龙730哪个好? 配置、跑分对比
摘 要 联发科g90t和骁龙730都是两款产品中还不错的处理器,那么,联发科g90t和骁龙730哪个好?接下来小编就为大家带来联发科g90t和骁龙730配置及跑分对比,感兴趣的朋友可以看一下: 联发 ...
- 鸿蒙系统跑分对比骁龙强吗,iQOO Z3 手机骁龙 768G 跑分对比天玑 1000+
IT之家3月22日消息此前消息称,iQOO 5G 新机 iQOO Z3 预计将于 3 月 25 日发布,现在一款"lito"机型跑分曝光.据微博博主@数码闲聊站 ,这就是iQOO ...
- Linux UnixBench跑分的使用
2019独角兽企业重金招聘Python工程师标准>>> 安装: 手动下载UniBench地址:http://soft.vpser.net/test/unixbench/ 或者使用命 ...
- 鸿蒙系统跑分对比骁龙强吗,跑分确实高了:鸿蒙系统安兔兔跑分出炉,但不足以解释系统流畅度...
原标题:跑分确实高了:鸿蒙系统安兔兔跑分出炉,但不足以解释系统流畅度 自从鸿蒙系统发布之后,这款系统究竟体验如何,就成了很多人关注的焦点.但由于不是人人都有华为最新Mate系列和P系列旗舰,所以很多人 ...
- 麒麟9000和骁龙865哪个好 麒麟9000和骁龙865跑分对比 实测告诉你怎么选择
麒麟9000和骁龙865哪个好呢?请跟我一起了解一下两款处理器跑分对比评测. 麒麟9000处理器参数 麒麟9000处理器是基于台积电5nm工艺制程打造,其中集成超过153亿个晶体管.CPU部分采用一个 ...
- 三星980处理器和骁龙855_高通发布骁龙855,Exynos 9820、麒麟980安兔兔跑分对比来了...
北京时间12月5日凌晨,高通在夏威夷举办骁龙技术峰会,正式发布了骁龙855移动平台.骁龙855系全球首款面支持数千兆比特5G.业界领先的人工智能(AI)和沉浸式扩展现实(XR)的商用移动平台. 骁龙8 ...
- 联发科p60和骁龙710哪个好_联发科P70和骁龙710跑分对比,骁龙完胜!
摘 要 联发科P70和骁龙710性能差距有多大?Helio P70要比骁龙710出生早很多,目前市面上有很多主流手机配置骁龙710处理器,联发科P70机型和骁龙710哪个值得入手?今天笔者来折腾联发科 ...
最新文章
- 一条命令下载google壁纸,含错误解决方法
- UVA1626 括号序列 Brackets sequence(区间DP匹配括号,输出匹配方案)
- 第 17 章 Native SQL查询
- [Java]Java中的i++不是原子操作
- JS之 if语句函数 对接事件动作 函数更改css css对接需要换妆的区id或class
- Oracle宣布新的Java Champions
- 计算机应用与基础进制,计算机应用基础选择题-删进制、字符题(2).docx
- 循环比赛日程表(信息学奥赛一本通-T1325)
- 反射方式,获取出集合ArrayList类的class文件对象
- 局部变量与全局变量同名时如何在局部变量的作用范围内访问全局变量?
- 联想g510升级换什么cpu好_联想G510笔记本完全拆机指南(图解)
- 60万餐厅数据为你画出全国美食地图(附技术讲解)
- 固态硬盘的速度和内存的速度差距
- hadoop 8088端口网页无法打开的原因分析
- 手机通讯终端软件硬件测试,浅谈基于SWP方案的近场通信终端测试及其方法探究...
- 【c语言】—求最大公约数和最小公倍数多种方法
- 组装一台电脑需要哪些基本配件?
- 计算机网络高级教程.pdf,网络技术-计算机网络(高级教程).pdf
- 在for循环中运行setTimeout的三种情况
- 快速插入2000万数据
热门文章
- (全程图解)Axure RP8 安装及使用教程
- 【图像叠加】将一个图片放到另一个图片上
- 如何验证快递单号是否符合对应的快递公司呢,收集到以下的正则,可能会帮到我们
- JS实现数字字母混合验证码(数字+大写字母+小写字母)
- c盘越来越大怎么清理?C:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository
- JUC(狂神版)全面总结
- MyBatis-Plus入门
- H5-阿里云JSSDK集成、实现一键登录功能
- 打字标准 / 打字键位 / 打字速度提升
- 基于Linux python2.X与python3.X默认版本切换