中兴设备的跑分：

http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/233293.htm

网络谣传intel的最新产品的跑分：

http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/243891.htm

这个跑分一直备受质疑，随之有好事者发了文章进行综合对比：

《Has Intel Really Beaten ARM?》

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&itc=eetimes_sitedefault&doc_id=1318857

文中指出：

This is a tremendous discrepancy. In a statistical evaluation, it would be normal to eliminate the outlying data points. If we do this, the much cited AnTuTu benchmark would not be included in the final evaluation. In addition, the outlying figures would be examined for errors.

在多款软件之中，antuttu的跑分出现严重的前后矛盾的地方，因此，安兔兔的跑分将不会纳入最终的评估范围。

这件事还没有就这样结束：

《AnTuTu and Intel》

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2330027

一个叫Exophase的工程师在安兔兔的论坛上，发表了自己对安兔兔程序在ARM和X86平台上的软件进行反汇编的时候的发现的问题。

What it's doing is, where possible, setting entire 32 bit runs to 0 or 1. The lines at f64c3 and f64c6 are critical. It's replacing 32 iterations of the ARM loop above with those two instructions. Needless to say, it's dozens of times faster doing it this way.

简单的说，一些依赖于时间跑分项目，ARM要执行多次，但是Intel直接跳过了。

作者认为antutu被“操纵”了，最大的可能性是为了钱。

But frankly, I blame AnTuTu in all of this. They allowed themselves to be manipulated (probably for a price), despite constantly warning against other people cheating their numbers. I don't know if they're displaying a complete lack of integrity or a complete lack of understanding of how their own software works, or something in between the two, but whatever the case I hope they lose all credibility and whatever revenue the program brings them.

不知道在这件事中，是antutu的节操，还是intel的节操掉了。

附上中文分析：

安兔兔节操碎了一地？Intel Atom跑分高的”真相“谜团