一次direct path read 故障处理

说明：
产生direct path read事件的原因有三种情况：

Causes

This situation occurs in the following situations:

The sorts are too large to fit in memory and some of the sort data is written out directly to disk. This data is later read back in, using direct reads.
Parallel slaves are used for scanning data.
The server process is processing buffers faster than the I/O system can return the buffers. This can indicate an overloaded I/O system.

PFGRF94490

10.3.4.2 Actions

The file_id shows if the reads are for an object in TEMP tablespace (sorts to disk) or full table scans by parallel slaves. This wait is the largest wait for large data warehouse sites. However, if the workload is not a Decision Support Systems (DSS) workload, then examine why this situation is happening.

PFGRF94491 10.3.4.2.1 Sorts to Disk

Examine the SQL statement currently being run by the session experiencing waits to see what is causing the sorts. Query V$TEMPSEG_USAGE to find the SQL statement that is generating the sort. Also query the statistics from V$SESSTAT for the session to determine the size of the sort. See if it is possible to reduce the sorting by tuning the SQL statement. If WORKAREA_SIZE_POLICY is MANUAL, then consider increasing the SORT_AREA_SIZE for the system (if the sorts are not too big) or for individual processes. If WORKAREA_SIZE_POLICY is AUTO, then investigate whether to increase PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET. See "PGA Memory Management".

PFGRF94492 10.3.4.2.2 Full Table Scans

If tables are defined with a high degree of parallelism, then this setting could skew the optimizer to use full table scans with parallel slaves. Check the object being read into using the direct path reads. If the full table scans are a valid part of the workload, then ensure that the I/O subsystem is adequate for the degree of parallelism. Consider using disk striping if you are not already using it or Oracle Automatic Storage Management (Oracle ASM).

PFGRF94493 10.3.4.2.3 Hash Area Size

For query plans that call for a hash join, excessive I/O could result from having HASH_AREA_SIZE too small. If WORKAREA_SIZE_POLICY is MANUAL, then consider increasing the HASH_AREA_SIZE for the system or for individual processes. If WORKAREA_SIZE_POLICY is AUTO, then investigate whether to increasePGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET.

案例：

2014年11月17日16:30-17:30时营销数据库(toyx1a)出现在大量的direct path read、direct path read temp、direct path write temp、db file scattered read、read by other session事件。通过分析出现所有的等待事件都集中在表UTL.T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M上。

ASH 报告中direct path read在整个等待事件里占比为26.24%

Event	Event Class	% Event	Avg Active Sessions
CPU + Wait for CPU	CPU	36.40	2.66
direct path read	User I/O	26.24	1.92
direct path read temp	User I/O	8.00	0.58
direct path write temp	User I/O	6.73	0.49
db file scattered read	User I/O	5.94	0.43

Top Event P1/P2/P3 Values

Event	% Event	P1 Value, P2 Value, P3 Value	% Activity	Parameter 1	Parameter 2	Parameter 3
direct path read	26.24	"10","209408","128"	0.03	file number	first dba	block cnt
direct path read temp	8.00	"2001","469469","31"	0.01	file number	first dba	block cnt
direct path write temp	6.73	"2001","492862","31"	0.01	file number	first dba	block cnt
db file scattered read	5.94	"9","461440","49"	0.01	file#	block#	blocks
read by other session	4.76	"15","470969","1"	0.01	file#	block#	class#

通过direct path read事件的p1,p2,p3值我们可以定位到该事件在哪个对象上发生等待

P1: File_id for the read call
P2: Start block_id for the read call
P3: Number of blocks in the read call

SQL> select owner,segment_name,segment_type,partition_name from dba_extents where file_id=10 and 209408 between block_id and block_id+blocks-1;

owner segment_name segment_type   partition_name
--------- ---------------------   ------------------- ------------------------------
UTL T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M   TABLE PARTITION CUSTOM_PROFILE_PART_10 =====>direct path read 发生在表T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M上。

通过read by other session事件的p1,p2.p3值同样也可以定位到该事件在哪个对象上发生等待

Parameter	Description
file#	See "file#"
block#	See "block#"
class#	See "class"

SQL> select owner,segment_name,segment_type,partition_name from dba_extents where file_id=15 and 470969 between block_id and block_id+blocks-1;
OWNER SEGMENT_NAME SEGMENT_TYPE PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------
UTL T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M TABLE PARTITION CUSTOM_PROFILE_PART_2

通过db file scattered read 的p1,p2,p3同样也可以诊断该事件在哪个对象上发生等待

Similar to db file sequential read, except that the session is reading multiple data blocks.

Wait Time: The wait time is the actual time it takes to do all of the I/Os

Parameter	Description
file#	See "file#"
block#	See "block#"
blocks	The number of blocks that the session is trying to read from the file# starting at block#

SQL> set lines 200
SQL> set pages 500
SQL> select owner,segment_name,segment_type,partition_name from dba_extents where file_id=9 and 461440 between block_id and block_id+blocks-1;

OWNER SEGMENT_NAME SEGMENT_TYPE PARTITION_NAME
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------
UTL T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M TABLE PARTITION CUSTOM_PROFILE_PART_2

从上述三种等待事来看，所有的等待都集中在表T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M 上，因此可以断定是由包含此表的相关语句导致的性能问题。
因此我们在ASH报告里搜索表T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M发现如下语句，且该语句都存在order by 排序，因此也可以断定为什么该语句产生大量的direct path read 、direct path read temp事件了。

005wu57dp2nvz

select * from (select * from (select SERV_NO, GPRS_FEE_2, TOLL_CALL_FEE, GPRS_FEE_1, ARPU, GPRS_PRIV_FEE3, OVERPKG_MARK, JTCT_CALL_DUR, PKG_USED_FLOW, MYZJ_CALL_DUR, PKG_USED_PROP, OVERPKG_FLOW, CALL_PRICE2, VPMN_CALL_DUR, BDCT_CALL_DUR, STABILITY_SCORE, STAR_LEVEL_MARK, VPMNSP_CALL_DUR, ENTERPRISE_MARK, VPMN_FLAG, GPRS_FLOW_M, PKG_ALL_FLOW, ARPU_PRICE, PHOTOMEM_MARK, IS_MIGU_ORDER, IS_LINGXI_ORDER, IS_MOBMAP_ORDER, IS_PIM_ACTIVE, IS_MIGU_ACTIVE, CRING_FLAG, IS_CHEZHU_ACTIVE, IS_PIM_ORDER, IS_FETION_ACTIVE, IS_MOBMAP_ACTIVE, IS_139_5_ACTIVE, IS_MOBREAD_ORDER, IS_MOBGAME_ORDER, IS_FETION_ORDER, IS_139_20_ACTIVE, IS_LINGXI_ACTIVE, IS_139_5_ORDER, IS_139_20_ORDER, TERM_BRAND, TERM_USE_TIME, TERM_CODE, TERM_GET_DATE, TERM_TYPE, COOPERATE_FLEG, OPEN_DATE, YXPH_FREE, TOTAL_SCORE, YX_ZFPH, YX_BAODI, YXPH_HYYJ, YXPH_FEE, YXPH_OBJ, YXPH_TERM, PLAN_NAME, ACTIVE_DEPT_ID, ACTIVE_AREA_ID, GPRS_PRIV_FEE1, ROAM_CALL_FEE, GPRS_PRIV_FEE2, PLAN_ID from T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M where SERV_NO ='13583152372' ord er by DATA_MONTH desc ) where rownum=1 ) t0

0vyp4gqddp7mk

select * from (select * from (select SERV_NO, PAY_TYPE, GPRS_FEE_2, GPRS_FEE_1, ARPU, BRAND_ID, FEE_INCREASE, FEE_DECREASE, GPRS_FLOW_2, BECOME_DUE, UNBALANCE_FLAG, CALL_DURA_M, PRIV_4G_MARK, BECOME_TIME, SPRODUCT_MARK, SC_USER_MARK, TIME_DECREASE, UNIONACCT_MARK, PHOTOMEM_MARK, TERM_BRAND, TERM_USE_TIME, TERM_CODE, TERM_GET_DATE, TERM_TYPE, SEX_ID, USER_STATUS, OPEN_DATE, CITY_ID, PREPAY_FEE, GIVE_FEE, TOTAL_SCORE, YX_BAODI, CREDIT_LEV from T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M where SERV_NO ='13688689651' order by DATA_MONTH desc ) where rownum=1 ) t0

gyzcb1gqtscms

select * from (select * from (select SERV_NO, GPRS_FEE_2, TOLL_CALL_FEE, GPRS_FEE_1, ARPU, GPRS_PRIV_FEE3, OVERPKG_MARK, JTCT_CALL_DUR, PKG_USED_FLOW, MYZJ_CALL_DUR, PKG_USED_PROP, OVERPKG_FLOW, CALL_PRICE2, VPMN_CALL_DUR, BDCT_CALL_DUR, STABILITY_SCORE, STAR_LEVEL_MARK, VPMNSP_CALL_DUR, ENTERPRISE_MARK, VPMN_FLAG, GPRS_FLOW_M, PKG_ALL_FLOW, ARPU_PRICE, PHOTOMEM_MARK, IS_MIGU_ORDER, IS_LINGXI_ORDER, IS_MOBMAP_ORDER, IS_PIM_ACTIVE, IS_MIGU_ACTIVE, CRING_FLAG, IS_CHEZHU_ACTIVE, IS_PIM_ORDER, IS_FETION_ACTIVE, IS_MOBMAP_ACTIVE, IS_139_5_ACTIVE, IS_MOBREAD_ORDER, IS_MOBGAME_ORDER, IS_FETION_ORDER, IS_139_20_ACTIVE, IS_LINGXI_ACTIVE, IS_139_5_ORDER, IS_139_20_ORDER, TERM_BRAND, TERM_USE_TIME, TERM_CODE, TERM_GET_DATE, TERM_TYPE, COOPERATE_FLEG, OPEN_DATE, YXPH_FREE, TOTAL_SCORE, YX_ZFPH, YX_BAODI, YXPH_HYYJ, YXPH_FEE, YXPH_OBJ, YXPH_TERM, PLAN_NAME, ACTIVE_DEPT_ID, ACTIVE_AREA_ID, GPRS_PRIV_FEE1, ROAM_CALL_FEE, GPRS_PRIV_FEE2, PLAN_ID from T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M where SERV_NO ='13969809161' ord er by DATA_MONTH desc ) where rownum=1 ) t0

语句查找出来了，哪为啥突然之间会出现性能问题呢？
首先我们查看该语句的执行计划：
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_awr('005wu57dp2nvz',null,null,'all'));

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL_ID 005wu57dp2nvz
--------------------
select * from (select * from (select
SERV_NO,GPRS_FEE_2,TOLL_CALL_FEE,GPRS_FEE_1,ARPU,GPRS_PRIV_FEE3,OVERPKG_
MARK,JTCT_CALL_DUR,PKG_USED_FLOW,MYZJ_CALL_DUR,PKG_USED_PROP,OVERPKG_FLO
W,CALL_PRICE2,VPMN_CALL_DUR,BDCT_CALL_DUR,STABILITY_SCORE,STAR_LEVEL_MAR
K,VPMNSP_CALL_DUR,ENTERPRISE_MARK,VPMN_FLAG,GPRS_FLOW_M,PKG_ALL_FLOW,ARP
U_PRICE,PHOTOMEM_MARK,IS_MIGU_ORDER,IS_LINGXI_ORDER,IS_MOBMAP_ORDER,IS_P
IM_ACTIVE,IS_MIGU_ACTIVE,CRING_FLAG,IS_CHEZHU_ACTIVE,IS_PIM_ORDER,IS_FET
ION_ACTIVE,IS_MOBMAP_ACTIVE,IS_139_5_ACTIVE,IS_MOBREAD_ORDER,IS_MOBGAME_
ORDER,IS_FETION_ORDER,IS_139_20_ACTIVE,IS_LINGXI_ACTIVE,IS_139_5_ORDER,I

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S_139_20_ORDER,TERM_BRAND,TERM_USE_TIME,TERM_CODE,TERM_GET_DATE,TERM_TYP
E,COOPERATE_FLEG,OPEN_DATE,YXPH_FREE,TOTAL_SCORE,YX_ZFPH,YX_BAODI,YXPH_H
YYJ,YXPH_FEE,YXPH_OBJ,YXPH_TERM,PLAN_NAME,ACTIVE_DEPT_ID,ACTIVE_AREA_ID,
GPRS_PRIV_FEE1,ROAM_CALL_FEE,GPRS_PRIV_FEE2,PLAN_ID from
T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M where SERV_NO ='13583152372' order by DATA_MONTH desc
) where rownum=1 ) t0

Plan hash value: 3173533799

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2682K(100)| | | |
| 1 | VIEW | | 1 | 1135 | 2682K (2)| 08:56:34 | | |
| 2 | COUNT STOPKEY | | | | | | | |
| 3 | VIEW | | 1 | 1135 | 2682K (2)| 08:56:34 | | |
| 4 | SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY| | 1 | 289 | 2682K (2)| 08:56:34 | | | ＝＝＝＝〉存在排序
| 5 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 1 | 289 | 2682K (2)| 08:56:34 | 1 | 18 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M | 1 | 289 | 2682K (2)| 08:56:34 | 1 | 18 | ＝＝＝＝〉该表发生全表扫。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):

1 - SEL$2 / T0@SEL$1
2 - SEL$2
3 - SEL$3 / from$_subquery$_002@SEL$2
4 - SEL$3
6 - SEL$3 / T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M@SEL$3

发现该语句的执行计划发生了改变，查看对象索引的创建时间发现创建时间为2014-11-17 17:19:35 因此可以断定此索引刚刚建上。

SQL> SELECT OWNER,CREATED FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE OBJECT_NAME='INX_T_C_L_CUST_INFO_M_SERV_NO';

OWNER CREATED
------------------------------ -------------------
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35
UTL 2014-11-17 17:19:35

结论：
最后通过和研发沟通，该索引删除的目的是为了加快sqlldr导数据的速度。

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：http://blog.itpub.net/29446986/viewspace-1336846/，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/29446986/viewspace-1336846/